X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Banging my head against the guile-for-windows wall
Date:	Wed, 24 Sep 2014 00:39:35 +0200
Lines:	20
Message-ID:	<lvssr7$lun$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<20140923045453 DOT 56dc3de2 AT akka> <CAOuGh8_bfL2KJDLt-qkU7v0wS3UBkbHeej6ScVLJJfHnOR_6oQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	a89-182-78-195.net-htp.de
User-Agent:	KNode/4.12.4
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Bob Paddock wrote:

> Warnings *are* errors, they should not be ignored.
> 
> I have found it rare for most GCC based code to compile with
> anything less than -std=gnu99.
> 
> Rather than disable Werror, remove the -ansi and possibly the
> -pedantic, add -std=gnu99.
> 

Fair enough.
To see this amount of warnings in code that is supposed to be the part 
of the backbone of the GNU suite is a bit disconnecting, though. This 
interpreter was started by gnu-gurus twenty years ago. I'd expect them 
to have ironed out this kind of wrinkles long time ago. But who am I 
to judge? After all, I wouldn't complain about warnings at all, if the 
result would just run...

---<)kaimartin(>---

- Raw text -