X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 15 Sep 2014 01:08:06 -0500 (CDT)
From:	mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca
X-X-Sender:	mskala AT localhost DOT localdomain
To:	geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] A complete set of CJK glyphs rendered as PCB
	symbols
In-Reply-To:	<CAHUm0tNZoS6=CSyb0N2uyEg8b=QPrqcdH_v1kwuydcBAjPYrTA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.LNX.2.02.1409150106440.8864@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<CAHUm0tNe1zgfb02ftk-o0dvaDUUuO0ed2VHgEcbgaqdZkjim0A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <1410720667 DOT 1331 DOT 1 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de> <CAHUm0tNw_D0uUain8Px_CgyiDv=fdj1=C5VrdrYQog+8cNKJaA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT LNX DOT 2 DOT 02 DOT 1409142313390 DOT 4878 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAHUm0tNZoS6=CSyb0N2uyEg8b=QPrqcdH_v1kwuydcBAjPYrTA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.02 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Scanned-By:	MIMEDefang 2.74
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 15 Sep 2014, Erich Heinzle wrote:
> Which CJK symbol set should ideally be used is not the rate limiting step
> here, unicode support within symbol definitions is.

I agree - and that would have many other benefits too, because there
are many characters and symbols people might want to use on PCBs besides
Chinese.  Even just a few of the symbols in the Zapf Dingbats range would
be nice to have.
-- 
Matthew Skala
mskala AT ansuz DOT sooke DOT bc DOT ca                 People before principles.
http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/

- Raw text -