X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<53C70464.9090306@sonic.net>
Date:	Wed, 16 Jul 2014 16:01:56 -0700
From:	Dave Curtis <davecurtis AT sonic DOT net>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121028 Thunderbird/16.0.2
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Octagon flag on Pad[]
References:	<53C69EB6 DOT 6030003 AT sonic DOT net> <53C6B815 DOT 10108 AT sonic DOT net> <201407161832 DOT s6GIWTDV006574 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201407161832.s6GIWTDV006574@envy.delorie.com>
X-Sonic-ID:	C;HJMoLz0N5BGdyE2zUc16mQ== M;JgVwLz0N5BGdyE2zUc16mQ==
X-Spam-Flag:	No
X-Sonic-Spam-Details:	0.0/5.0 by cerberusd
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 07/16/2014 11:32 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> I guess I don't understand the logic of not allowing the octagon flag on
>> Pad[]'s, since they are allowed on Pin[]'s.  It seems to me that all the
>> logic should be there to draw them -- wouldn't they be handled the same
>> as a square aperture, even when the pad is parallel to the X/Y axes?
>
> Most pads are not squares, just rectangles.

Doesn't really address my question.  A rectangle is drawn by 
interpolating a square aperture.  The round-end rectangle pads are drawn 
by interpolating a round aperture.  Since the standard set of base 
apertures defined in RS-274X includes octagons, and PCB already flashes 
octagons for Pin[]'s with the "octagon" flag, it seems like somebody 
went out of there way to turn off interpolation of octagon apertures.

- Raw text -