X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=8B0SYfeW+PaGMPvYEiG+i2oXxXcQf3i5C/BxKtBoOfU=;
	b=cpp2GX7t6C4+E/Wr/T4c+Ps+eHAmuEFPWPS5rP2KML4GJU3ymv/dhopXMNtFJolGIH
	+q6+YYUC8Qnc3qiUALqVhYJY1bOBoOs1F/ty6HQe/i0di2mv+F03SvQCWvfotpTkutbs
	oWR+obiqs7f4tGqYDiffAHqfMxBUa5JAHtjg/ae0+ffRYuy/0vcaIJwWEn0NqlxJIqBJ
	i93z/VlpCWRlhpXRSf62zuVsgxVL3OMuK/z/FS23eh34m1W7yxj/XkVv04VlR+2sddHe
	XL1i9rdlKuR/feIXAWHczb2ye2sczza+C+c4Q+v1DE8l1Xaf3DF825wNSYyC27zyt0+J
	mxew==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.43.170 with SMTP id x10mr18303076igl.20.1392665948833;
	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 11:39:08 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<CADefDOFZpsbx909CVRp91AQwKq5+FjvhCacdKtGj5uh-QwyWPA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CADefDOFZpsbx909CVRp91AQwKq5+FjvhCacdKtGj5uh-QwyWPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Mon, 17 Feb 2014 20:39:08 +0100
Message-ID:	<CADefDOELPMgSbcQiPqomjB5y27WtJuPwFLGS=QACcHh2mUVBaw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	[geda-user] Re: gEDA as alternative for KiCad (for me)?
From:	Michai Ramakers <m DOT ramakers AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

thank you for the comments btw; I appreciate it.

The obvious thing with things like EDA suites is that one picks one,
then invests time and grows a library and gets to know the workflow;
it's difficult and cumbersome to change to something else. That's why
hands-on experience from people actually using it is important, at
least to me.

Michai

- Raw text -