X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<526DB611.9060502@ecosensory.com>
Date:	Sun, 27 Oct 2013 19:55:45 -0500
From:	John Griessen <john AT ecosensory DOT com>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Power to ICs with numslots > 1
References:	<CANhYM9G+eK=9V8L59PyU8nCOO22GVVF1bRb3TRC9kbACazfg8w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201310261908 DOT r9QJ8Vv8025803 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <526C1AF1 DOT 8000107 AT sbcglobal DOT net> <CANhYM9GCyOjemHcYBv75kt2D6973F_4Uymx1UusjPCQ9JokoAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT BSF DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1310261615520 DOT 66315 AT earl-grey DOT cloud9 DOT net>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1310261615520.66315@earl-grey.cloud9.net>
X-RR-Connecting-IP:	107.14.168.142:25
X-Cloudmark-Score:	0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 10/26/2013 03:24 PM, Stuart Brorson wrote:
> For larger, more complicated parts (i.e. with lots of power/GND pins),
> I think it's better to have a separate schematic symbol for the chip
> power pins with all the power/GND pins attached to the symbol.  Then
> you can tie them to power/GND as you see fit, and add decoupling caps,
> chokes, etc. as necessary to the symbol.  This is important for parts
> which call out complicated bypassing/decoupling schemes.  Meanwhile,
> have a separate symbol (with the same refdes) elsewhere in the
> schematic with all the logic pins or other component functionality
> attached to pins.

Like that method hint.

JG

- Raw text -