Mail Archives: geda-user/2013/07/10/20:51:44
On 07/10/2013 03:45 PM, John Doty wrote:
> On Jul 10, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Dave Curtis wrote:
>
>>> Slotting requires "numslots", "slot", and "pinseq". Some gnetlist back ends also need "pinseq".
>>> All that slotting stuff is one of the big motivators for 'correct by construction' symbols.
> Well, beware that it's impossible to be 'correct by construction' for all flows. For example, the use of "pinseq" by slotting is incompatible with its use in the spice and spice-sdb back ends. My experimental spice-noqsi back end avoids this by having other ways to handle pin sequencing.
Well, in my personal use case, slotting is a must-have, and spice is something that I used once in the 1970's and haven't touched since. So whatever pinseq bugs are left in my symbols w.r.t. spice someone else will have to fix :)
-dave
>
> John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
> http://www.noqsi.com/
> jpd AT noqsi DOT com
>
>
>
- Raw text -