X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	mime-version:in-reply-to:references:content-type:message-id
	:content-transfer-encoding:from:subject:date:to; s=beta; bh=rgxZ
	ZjGWvIf8VTsGa26zu5/gJlqz2JG7u7PUPG5zTQI=; b=WZ1L7DaQ3a5XSQSDdnf8
	AaWDm5pe0SihFZE1ANqDodhTnoYKhYIQIwWP5neBC2n9xafA2a3cMwcGLGDkaUG1
	rQGPa/jh2uI+UpYPJsLu5oMlXeNcYwXOeLarA1NZjyfwdfeB5ymR6MRx5801JU6/
	+o5PZ4nmn2ufc13+XqlHsH4=
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Apple Message framework v753.1)
In-Reply-To:	<k6kqok$l6s$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<20121028164801 DOT GA4859 AT alpha2> <CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com> <6BF2E986-51EB-41E9-A4AD-8071CD00B1A1 AT jump-ing DOT de> <834283D4-0891-486E-A981-2FF20B32C615 AT noqsi DOT com> <C3C35AF4-24D1-4977-9134-2C0B13473D01 AT jump-ing DOT de> <54CAA7EE-7638-4B89-8197-111D0493F859 AT noqsi DOT com> <D59D8F6D-0436-4A8D-AFC0-5124BD3031D6 AT jump-ing DOT de> <508CE947 DOT 4050408 AT xs4all DOT nl> <508D302D DOT 1030105 AT jump-ing DOT de> <D04117DE-615E-412A-833E-4ED0F1B9A620 AT noqsi DOT com> <5FF7010F-BB82-41F2-8EBC-608E91E045F1 AT noqsi DOT com> <71Y DOT Jn6g DOT QcLTSHBZJi DOT 1GZPiP AT seznam DOT cz> <k6kqok$l6s$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Message-Id:	<79ED4BAB-39D2-4265-98E5-D7DF221CE3C6@jump-ing.de>
From:	Markus Hitter <mah AT jump-ing DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was: Pin hole size)
Date:	Mon, 29 Oct 2012 11:33:52 +0100
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.753.1)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Am 29.10.2012 um 03:47 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:

> Results were not very surprising: Almost everybody does gschem->pcb.
> Some also do some other work-flows.

Indeed not very surprising and I see no problem either.

Let's compare this to gcc, the C compiler. About everybody uses it to  
create binaries from source code. Still a few use it to only  
preprocess source code and gcc happily supports this. You can also  
create binaries from modified preprocessed sources. One just has to  
keep the intermediate files intact and I see no efforts to make them  
going away in gEDA.

Aligning gschem and pcb and both to modern GUI guidelines just means  
getting a more usable user interface, not more, not less. The files  
created by this user interface are untouched by this process.

BTW., even John D's schematics are processed into PCBs. I find it  
unfortunate they don't use gEDA's pcb for this task.


Markus

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -