www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2012/10/26/22:21:16

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at neurotica.com
Message-ID: <508B4509.8050102@neurotica.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2012 22:20:57 -0400
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire AT neurotica DOT com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121011 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: [geda-user] The state of gEDA/gaf (Was gEDA/PCBs diversity, Was:
Pin hole size)
References: <CANqhZFxYH+Y5U1ai7ey-s+4nz6eYDM2vx3aMDb7WuigNXmi4AQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <2CB304B5-9587-4734-84E4-49F464744D11 AT noqsi DOT com> <CANqhZFwPNG4R1dR2X0HB+tP1JzNXUAVg55gy54Lry5E49aAQ6Q AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <E9D200C7-475C-4CC7-A592-5A6C14B3EA25 AT noqsi DOT com> <508AC7AA DOT 9010305 AT neurotica DOT com> <k6fbfq$nca$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <57074F6E-5AC0-4CB3-A333-215BEAA0FC20 AT noqsi DOT com> <201210270147 DOT q9R1lv1O025750 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <508B3F22 DOT 5020609 AT neurotica DOT com> <F172B36A-46AC-4AA1-ACFD-666F1DA835B8 AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <F172B36A-46AC-4AA1-ACFD-666F1DA835B8@noqsi.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 10/26/2012 10:13 PM, John Doty wrote:
> 
> On Oct 26, 2012, at 7:55 PM, Dave McGuire wrote:
> 
>> On 10/26/2012 09:47 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>>> an ugly bug-prone kludge if pasted atop gschem's ancient foundation.
>>>
>>> Please try to use less emotionally charged terms in the future.
>>
>>  Yeah really.  Gschem's foundation can't be THAT "ancient", if it's
>> using modern GTK stuff.  And I have to say, as someone who uses it most
>> every day, the thing works great.
> 
> Its integration with gtk is not comfortable. It does work great as is, but trying to torque it into something more modern makes little sense. Another problem is that the Guile scripting is pasted on rather than truly built in, so it hasn't been very effective.

  Understood.  Is it possible to "rework" the GTK integration such that
it's more "natural" for a GTK app?  I mean, I realize that it's NOT a
GTK app, but still...at least for the GTK HID.

            -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire, AK4HZ
New Kensington, PA

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019