X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Spam-Checker-Version:	SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	ham01.websitewelcome.com
X-Spam-Flag2999:	NO
X-Spam-Level2999:
X-Spam-Status2999:	"No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
DomainKey-Signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=gibibit.com;
	h=Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-BWhitelist:X-Source:X-Source-Args:X-Source-Dir:X-Source-Sender:X-Source-Auth:X-Email-Count:X-Source-Cap;
	b=YSrDepaCx8LvIC5uAnkU8WMayO39pbJTgEmq3Lr9hSrrerwSLkbty6HRhAmS30qygZypb8CvuD0iiBWm/1F5W8nJoeNsZQP/Mu17F2nMO76KXJXKfgr+tl5W9epXhFif;
Date:	Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:16:58 -0800
From:	Colin D Bennett <colin AT gibibit DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Mathematics of the arc element in pcb.
Message-ID:	<20111129141658.201b1875@svelte>
In-Reply-To:	<4ED3B931.9030008@iae.nl>
References:	<f939dc32b1872b74667a44388d598707 DOT squirrel AT ssl-webmail-vh DOT nl DOT clara DOT net>
	<20111127221519 DOT GG4766 AT malakian DOT lan>
	<4ED3B931 DOT 9030008 AT iae DOT nl>
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.7.9 (GTK+ 2.24.6; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-AntiAbuse:	This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse:	Primary Hostname - gator297.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Original Domain - delorie.com
X-AntiAbuse:	Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse:	Sender Address Domain - gibibit.com
X-BWhitelist:	no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender:	spk.venturedesignservices.com (svelte) [65.61.115.34]:60348
X-Source-Auth:	colin AT gibibit DOT com
X-Email-Count:	1
X-Source-Cap:	c2t5bGVuO3NreWxlbjtnYXRvcjI5Ny5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 17:39:13 +0100
myken <myken AT iae DOT nl> wrote:

> On 27-11-11 23:15, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> > Officially, pcb does not support stretched arcs for these
> > reasons.
> >
> > If you're willing to donate some time and numerical analysis to
> > get this stuff working well, that'd be wonderful. Peter C. has
> > suggested just getting rid of arcs and using bezier curves for
> > everything, but you can't do elliptical arcs with bezier
> > curves :(
> >
> Ok, thanks.
> For now I will assume WIDTH != HEIGHT is not supported. Which
> basically means pcb only supports circles or parts of a circle.
> Is there a need or wish for proper working arc's? If so, why?

To be precise, pcb does fully support arcs, in that it
supports a _circular arc_ (a segment of a circle).

However, an _elliptical arc_ (segment of an ellipse), is not
officially supported, even though partial internal support for
something like a 'stretched circular arc' does exist.

Regards,
Colin

- Raw text -