www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:33:51 -0500 |
Message-Id: | <201111081833.pA8IXpek012142@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <20111108180039.GA6472@yumi> (message from Cyril Hrubis on Tue, 8 |
Nov 2011 19:00:40 +0100) | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] duplicate refdes values |
References: | <20111108100616 DOT GA32119 AT yumi> |
<89AF1CB2-6703-4ABC-A43D-7EA37559426F AT noqsi DOT com> <20111108180039 DOT GA6472 AT yumi> | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> I'm saying this is a bug, I'm saying that this is worth a warning. What > about warning about duplicated refdes for syms that has no slotting > defined? Unfortunately, that's a very common case these days. *Most* of my designs have at least one such component, usually an MCU that I've split into 2-3 blocks (power, bus, I/O). The tricky part is being *reliable* about detecting overlapping refdes's vs an intentionally split-up component. You have to consider all the possible situations and plan accordingly. Also, just "saying this is a bug" doesn't get stuff done. If you want it done, you need to be willing to do it too.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |