www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2011/11/08/13:33:57

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2011 13:33:51 -0500
Message-Id: <201111081833.pA8IXpek012142@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <20111108180039.GA6472@yumi> (message from Cyril Hrubis on Tue, 8
Nov 2011 19:00:40 +0100)
Subject: Re: [geda-user] duplicate refdes values
References: <20111108100616 DOT GA32119 AT yumi>
<89AF1CB2-6703-4ABC-A43D-7EA37559426F AT noqsi DOT com> <20111108180039 DOT GA6472 AT yumi>
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

> I'm saying this is a bug, I'm saying that this is worth a warning. What
> about warning about duplicated refdes for syms that has no slotting
> defined?

Unfortunately, that's a very common case these days.  *Most* of my
designs have at least one such component, usually an MCU that I've
split into 2-3 blocks (power, bus, I/O).

The tricky part is being *reliable* about detecting overlapping
refdes's vs an intentionally split-up component.  You have to consider
all the possible situations and plan accordingly.

Also, just "saying this is a bug" doesn't get stuff done.  If you want
it done, you need to be willing to do it too.

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019