Mail Archives: geda-help/2017/05/30/01:07:18
gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 29 May 2017, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via
> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>
>>>
>> Why private ?
>
> Because I asked so. I'm a geda* list member since the mid 2000s, I
> know how things can get done and how they get derailed.
>
> If he wants this feature to be implemented in a pcb-rnd parametric
> footprint, we'll need to have a productive, constructive discussion
> about some details. You may like it or not, you may agree or disagree,
> but my experience is that such a thing is more likely to happen in
> private than on geda-help@. (Derailing has already started, just read
> back the last few posts in the thread.)
>
> In other words it's just my decision on how pcb-rnd feature requests
> are done, just like your decision is using launchpad for pcb. Looking
> at how many feature requests we handle succesfully, it looks like my
> model is efficient.
>
>>
>> So we can all benefit ?
>
> All pcb-rnd (and related) code are public. The only thing that can
> keep you from the benefits is your own decision.
>
> Parametric footprints are almost 2 years old. All related code was
> public all the time. If any new code is written for an IPC-smt
> parametric footprint, it will be public from day 0 in our public svn.
>
> Does pcb support those parametric footprints?
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor2
>
>
Good reasons.
Success ;-)
Kind regards,
Bert Timmerman.
- Raw text -