X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 8 Mar 2017 14:06:18 +0100
From:	"Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via geda-help AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-help AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] pcb-rnd INS
Message-ID:	<20170308140618.1271944c@debian>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1703081134040.27212@igor2priv>
References:	<20170307114356 DOT 7446795f AT debian>
	<20170308111842 DOT 64a1f5a2 AT debian>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1703081134040 DOT 27212 AT igor2priv>
Organization:	Individuum auf blauem Planet
X-Mailer:	Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v28D6OKX020641
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Am Wed, 8 Mar 2017 11:36:54 +0100 (CET)
schrieb gedah AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu:

> On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Smilie (smilie AT posteo DOT de) [via
> geda-help AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> 
> > Another one.
> >
> >
> > 1. I use the debian unstable pcb-rnd
> > 2. I try to work with this version while i make a symbolic link:
> >   /usr/bin/pcb-rnd <- /usr/local/bin/pcb
> >   so i use psb-rnd with xgsch2pcb.
> >
> >
> > The want to use the tool INS for replace a ?32deg?  line to
> > a 45deg line.
> > But the system offering only a 90deg line.
> > I move the pointer around the Target-Point like in pcb, but nothing
> > happens. Only 90deg.
> >
> > Is there a change in the usability of INS?  
> 
> I think you need to turn on the all-direction-lines to get anything 
> useful out from the INS tool. I am not sure it can do 45 deg in 
> non-all-dir-lines mode.
> 
> I am not sure how this works with current mainline.
> 
> My plans on this with pcb-rnd is that I want to decouple insert from
> move: an insert should only insert a point, and should not start any
> other operation implicilty. Sometimes I just want a point to snap
> other things to. It'd also bypass the all-direction-lines problem
> mentioned above.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Igor2
> 
> 

No, all_direction_lines generates no 45°lines.
There is no reason to use all_direction_lines on combination with INS.
Because the result will be chaos.

I think im a advanced user. Im now in the position to use excessive the
INS-Function in combination without all_direction_lines and
without orthogonal_move,  because the result are clean lines in
0°,45°,90°,135°,180°,225°,270°,360°.


Please do not remove this feature!!!
I think this is essential for clean lines.
Many normatives force you to use None-90° lines.
The only clean angle without 90° is 45° for a clean EMC solution.

- Raw text -