X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<1372368022.2418.11.camel@AMD64X2.fritz.box>
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Best way to make Power Pins explicitly visible
From:	Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de>
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 27 Jun 2013 23:20:22 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<20185814.6mxDE0FZp3@nixdust>
References:	<20185814 DOT 6mxDE0FZp3 AT nixdust>
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.6.4
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 16:19 +0200, Anees Rehman wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I am following this
> "http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk/web/CD/engapps/geda/geda-doc/tutorials/tragesym/tragesym.html" tutorial to create gschem symbol 
> for AT86RF233 tranceiver. My problem is: what is the best way to make 
> power pins visible?
> 
> Though when I change the style for pwr pins from none to line in the 
> source template they become visble in schematic but I am not sure 
> whether it is the right way to do it.
> 
> Regads,
> Anees Rehman  

Hello,

seems that nobody else has find time to answer your question...

I have not used tragesym for some years -- but yes, your assumptions
should be true.

>bzcat /usr/share/doc/geda-1.8.1/wiki/media/tragesym/template2.txt.src.bz2 >|grep none
># style can be (line,dot,clk,dotclk,none). none if only want to add a
>net

So line,dot,clk,dotclk all give you visible pins with different shape --
none is used only if you want a invisible hidden power net.

djboxsym is another nice symbol generator -- for me tragesym was fine,
but I still wonder why its documentation is a spreadsheet tutorial.

- Raw text -