X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-help-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
	h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to
	:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type
	:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=r4L2pSvspStWG96SVBq5uTlhYwjZvGf7klKhepNUqY8=;
	b=hCzQcIjKO5fdC0rwZHww/8fV97Oz+c+ATk04LqPKrSvPKBnTROAG/9x+3zOY/Bhgqi
	qlkRIwRazQr1vZgQGksY8GRkK7uAW/OiuBq0jcTrWso+yjlGsH/8wsFm0e758dU9zQKt
	ltkiw1nNpyZ0vGp8U4vVY70qq6UDGz1KzyO7c=
Message-ID:	<4F1C60E5.1030403@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 22 Jan 2012 14:17:57 -0500
From:	Darryl Gibson <n2diy2 AT gmail DOT com>
Organization:	RKBA!
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111108 Thunderbird/3.1.16
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-help] Git/Xubuntu
References:	<4F1C0AA1 DOT 5010404 AT gmail DOT com> <20120122164921 DOT GA13355 AT malakian DOT lan>
In-Reply-To:	<20120122164921.GA13355@malakian.lan>
X-Enigmail-Version:	1.1.1
Reply-To:	geda-help AT delorie DOT com

On 01/22/2012 11:49 AM, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:09:53AM -0500, Darryl Gibson wrote:
>> Well, It took me a while, but I've got gschem and PCB working via Git.
>>
>> Last night I was pulling my hair out going through dependency hull, so I
>> slept on it.
>>
> 
> Installing gEDA from your package manager, or from source? If it was
> from source, was the problem that ./configure kept telling you you
> were missing things?

From source, via Git.

I don't remember which part of the install was throwing the errors, but
they were libs I couldn't locate with apt-get or synaptic. After
installing Gnome, and running through the install again, the two missing
packages were IDed in plain English.

>> Sometime between now and then I realized all the Gtk errors might be due
>> to the fact I wasn't running Gnome.
> 
> Most likely, you just need gnome installed (or some gtk packages).
> Actually running it is unnecessary, unless you want to.

Yes, though installing Gnome seriously messed up Xfce4 and Xfwm4, which
I just got done fixing with help from the folks at #xfce. And Gnome
hasn't show up as an option at log in, but that's ok.
>>
>> I found one mistake in the instructions, make install wouldn't run, but
>> sudo make install did.
>>
> 
> This is fine. Some people don't have sudo. Some people don't install
> into directories they don't have permissions for. So there's probably
> no general way to fix the instructions.

Ok, I just let the installer do its thing, where the files go I don't
know. :) I just remembered using sudo on previous source installs.

>> If there is interest, I can do another Git/Xubuntu install on my test
>> box, and document what's what.
>>
> 
> No thanks. If the problem was simply missing dependecies, it's not a
> big deal since developers are (mostly) used to dealing with that sort
> of thing, and users don't need to, since their package manager will
> deal with it for them.

True, though the reason I felt compelled to install from source is
because (X)Ubuntu seems to lag so far behind the current version of
geda, and I had a nagging feeling that the version I was using was
broken. But now I'm current, as of 36 hours ago, so alls well. (knock knock)

-- 
Darryl Gibson N2DIY
Linux, free software, for the people, by the people.

- Raw text -