X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Recipient:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=S+YAkmhmXl/CE54BJFF+EKYWkxQ88xmeaF/nwnCGz8A=;
	b=E2/7Io5SvjXfDE8H3NuSyLsANML4TpqqcXREaEBTlSOEYSVj3Z/C9uEE8xRxs5o1Ql
	rzp9Bp1frrnccQFuWqMOJlZIm75FvDvcWZLUpNsvxeQWk5bPtN8BcokFhoiLM10jXiB7
	sZpVwTfHI/PfnFTM16OlCdv2qDjEFZjErDyiC1SdKqIXLXKQg+eW0ILDIvV0u3lDitAj
	2d/ovvchxB5uh68VqE/YsEBRv7PgfWKtlDS/eo/cR+oQM4ODq/gUDtHx+Lw/Ry7pvzej
	yH0Hu6HweWiFCUQe5xdHl1m1UZH7g25GgWAEriqmHQ06N4oCpExpKAqR0XDbDDBLXAAf
	wAzQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
	h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date
	:message-id:subject:to;
	bh=S+YAkmhmXl/CE54BJFF+EKYWkxQ88xmeaF/nwnCGz8A=;
	b=lUBN++L53A3CGx7xN1w+elVxSUBxCyXKWVR/57cWFJRGrj3Jb1fQ7Duyr+cYEYDVCb
	4dqaSujHtw4MuDVHw/A+zdxmaBEdZcuvmHKfCt9pVc90aWIWzYXRtkVzzpvdtOl5eMWK
	XOAmFrH6grofV85AMpClpZ7JlOv8YDbCOTazRCzu83Ag+VCcdMB69wCuiyG24CSl2hAl
	EBrTlhOlYIRcsUMwqs+lpPWE47mce3LnGm6DAkXEESVG+5+UgarlsBXTH6yB6Db3JCeb
	YYluHJ2vyYvx4Jk7cJX/EnX+c6HAHRG4GBh9Xk40DIIaMCLfALM5jyYfX3RTwT8UVFND
	9kHw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	AODbwcDpb/L1KcLsEzc5mtGtSblY0t5it3UkNPFeWmVhiJ3QvD0GShT0
	3bLZI+l4adFXX06NOEMt6fWtY8OWsA==
X-Received:	by 10.55.74.214 with SMTP id x205mr12687380qka.231.1494959692777;
	Tue, 16 May 2017 11:34:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<xny3tw3cpq.fsf@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<CAA2C=vCkJChtB6bWeToNGG6GuXeFze2EPyaztWZ631XqoBWWPA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<xny3tw3cpq DOT fsf AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
From:	"Ozkan Sezer (sezeroz AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 16 May 2017 21:34:52 +0300
Message-ID:	<CAA2C=vA+RoiJ-MEHAhU5NAivY=jLNpZAaSQ754Tnik83YnpnTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: dxe3gen patch: replace memcmp with strncmp
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On 5/16/17, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>> - if (memcmp(opt.excl_prefix[j], name, strlen(opt.excl_prefix[j])) == 0)
>> + if (strncmp(opt.excl_prefix[j], name, strlen(opt.excl_prefix[j])) == 0)
>
> If we're going to pass strlen() anyway, what is the down-side of just
> calling strcmp() ?  Our strcmp() implementation never reads past the end
> of string anyway, should be safe, and faster.
>

dxe3gen compares the prefix to export or exclude a symbol,
e.g. if one does -E _MySym, _MySym itself and also _MySym1
and _MySymbolName2 should count as Ok.  Unless I'm missing
something, the latter two won't count as Ok with plain strcmp()

- Raw text -