X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
X-Received:	by 10.129.172.6 with SMTP id k6mr7546479ywh.52.1489133293644;
	Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:08:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Received:	by 10.157.82.72 with SMTP id q8mr1997284otg.4.1489133293601; Fri,
	10 Mar 2017 00:08:13 -0800 (PST)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Date:	Fri, 10 Mar 2017 00:08:13 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<CAB9Rao8M=6bk+2BJGsCCQVs0q_aUHwf3+6zP+aG+k4oywE3LOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=84.82.215.132;
	posting-account=JWQfLgoAAAC8QKtkzNbcIxeduALJ3mlU
NNTP-Posting-Host:	84.82.215.132
References:	<a3cedf91-bd02-46a1-9f41-58a9747747b7 AT googlegroups DOT com> <CAB9Rao8M=6bk+2BJGsCCQVs0q_aUHwf3+6zP+aG+k4oywE3LOQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-ID:	<eaa5f75a-3128-4309-8d28-ab3a9ca1566b@googlegroups.com>
Subject:	Re: BUG: djgpp should allow 16-byte alignment
From:	"jwjagersma AT gmail DOT com [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]" <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Injection-Date:	Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:08:13 +0000
Bytes:	2865
Lines:	35
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id v2A8F2Ch002786
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Friday, 10 March 2017 00:13:25 UTC+1, Louis Santillan (lpsantil AT gmail DOT com) [via djgpp AT delorie DOT com]  wrote:
> Are you unable to use `--mstackrealign`, `-mpreferred-stack-boundary=num`, `-mincoming-stack-boundary=num` [0]?  Looks like you'll also need to force those options if you compile with `-Os` as well.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [0] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.5/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html#i386-and-x86-64-Options  
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 9, 2017 at 8:14 AM, jwjag DOT  DOT  DOT  AT gmail DOT com [via dj DOT  DOT  DOT  AT delorie DOT com] <dj DOT  DOT  DOT  AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Currently it seems that djgpp does not support 16-byte alignment. Since djgpp-compiled programs can potentially use SSE instructions (either explicitly or implicitly, when compiled with -march=pentium3), I do think this should be supported.
> 
> 
> 
> previous discussion:
> 
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79935

I was already using -mpreferred-stack-boundary=4 (which implies -mincoming-stack-boundary=4) but that didn't seem to have the intended effect. Most notably in static constructors, the stack alignment is always 8 bytes off. From the disassembly I can tell gcc does its best to keep the stack aligned, so that part works correctly, at least.

Now yesterday I had a problem in a non-static function, where gcc inserted an SSE instruction with a memory operand [ebp-0x58], with (ebp % 0x10 == 0x0c). That doesn't make any sense at all! It's guaranteed to cause a GP fault and gcc should know this.

- Raw text -