www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
From: | Rugxulo <rugxulo AT gmail DOT com> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: GNU Emacs 22.3 and Vista |
Date: | Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:56:46 -0700 (PDT) |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
Lines: | 18 |
Message-ID: | <be6da634-5c75-4fcd-96ea-9e77349621e1@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> |
References: | <c6f1ce2a-c0a9-45ec-992f-1e2925f53a72 AT r28g2000vbp DOT googlegroups DOT com> |
<uk564jmew DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <7b67b41d-4ec9-4d49-9e15-2b2db729e8cf AT 3g2000yqk DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
<ueiwcji5g DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <e9d6710f-e784-4d0e-90a2-deda66c286e5 AT e3g2000vbe DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
<u4ox7kafm DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <83fxgoda43 DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <c7c81398-f473-42b4-b6d9-2d3c4bedfc59 AT g37g2000yqn DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
<83ws9t358x DOT fsf AT gnu DOT org> <6fe30866-6add-4c07-93dc-47e56462a597 AT z9g2000yqi DOT googlegroups DOT com> | |
<200904092147 DOT n39LlMfW024105 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> | |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 65.13.115.246 |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | posting.google.com 1239314206 16705 127.0.0.1 (9 Apr 2009 21:56:46 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Thu, 9 Apr 2009 21:56:46 +0000 (UTC) |
Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
Injection-Info: | b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=65.13.115.246; |
posting-account=p5rsXQoAAAB8KPnVlgg9E_vlm2dvVhfO | |
User-Agent: | G2/1.0 |
X-HTTP-UserAgent: | Opera/9.64 (Windows NT 6.0; U; en) Presto/2.1.1,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Hi, On Apr 9, 4:47=A0pm, DJ Delorie <d DOT DOT DOT AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > > P.S. In fact, to come completely clean with yet another (horrible / > > crazy) idea, why not include Freemacs in GNU Emacs as well? Hey, it's > > GPL, it runs on 8086s, and it's smaller than even one single > > Changelog! (Okay, obviously RMS would complain that it uses TASM, but > > hey, that can be fixed if really desired.) No, I don't honestly expect > > this to happen, but it's not really that bad an idea, is it?? > > /me wonders if it could be modified to build with djasm... Of course. Even though DJASM misses a few opcodes, as long as you can emit raw bytes, it should work. Heck, GAS supports 16-bit now (and obviously NASM works too). And technically it could support building with all of them, why not? (Then again, to put it mildly, TASM code is pretty TASM-specific, but hey, that's what disassemblers are for!) :-)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |