X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	Juan Manuel Guerrero <juan DOT guerrero AT gmx DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: release 3 of the DJGPP port of GNU grep 2.5.3 uploaded.
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 07:29:45 -0800 (PST)
Organization:	http://groups.google.com
Lines:	42
Message-ID:	<abd28bbf-6218-4160-9111-3fdf39949814@l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
References:	<200801202022 DOT m0KKMLg0001310 AT delorie DOT com> <47941ACF DOT B8EBD95B AT yahoo DOT com>
	<4c6759dd-f536-49ea-8d8b-a2feb5192d77 AT f47g2000hsd DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<47956051 DOT 2DB8A290 AT yahoo DOT com> <29237ff0-179d-4d5a-a41c-45da1e35999a AT i12g2000prf DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<200801222057 DOT m0MKv39r017880 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <47967CB4 DOT 493C0E1C AT yahoo DOT com>
	<27d1396a-7456-4a20-950b-22214ca9526c AT h11g2000prf DOT googlegroups DOT com>
	<4797529d$1 AT news DOT upm DOT es>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	88.68.34.78
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1201102185 17029 127.0.0.1 (23 Jan 2008 15:29:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:29:45 +0000 (UTC)
Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
Injection-Info:	l32g2000hse.googlegroups.com; posting-host=88.68.34.78;
	posting-account=OsAajgoAAADdKJnkJkmhzqP0jo6I_P_0
User-Agent:	G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-us)
	AppleWebKit/48 (like Gecko) Safari/48,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id m0NFU45V032444
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Manuel Collado schrieb:
> Juan Manuel Guerrero escribi�:
> > [snip]
> > Neitherless, if DJ do not object I would suggest to change the
> > actual naming convention and adopt one similar to the one
> > that uses cygwin.  This is something like this:
> >   foobar123-1[bsd].zip
> > or
> >   foobar20080123-1[bsd].zip
> > The first means th package name followed by the version
> > number followed by release number (1 in this case).   We also
> > keep the b,d and s letters to code the type of package content.
> > The second version is for CVS checkouts or something similar
> > where the checkout timestamp is used as version number.
> > Suggestions, objections, comments are welcome.
>
> Just another possibility:
>
> - Use the current naming convention for the first release of each port.
> - Insert a 'rx' release designator before the [bsd] suffix for second
> and subsequent releases: xxx123b.zip -> xxx123r2b.zip -> xxx123r3b.zip

It seems a good idea to me.
If possible, the primary goal should be to retain the used
naming scheme.  The vast mayority of the ports will have
only one release and in that case there is no reason to
add something to the package name.  If a bug fix release
is needed a release identifier could be add.


> > I do not want to have to answer user questions like "which one of the
> > releases is the better one?" or "what shall I download?".
>
> Using the same name for really different releases is even worse. A lot
> of users asking for help will insist in that their DJGPP environments
> are up-to-date when in fact the aren't

Agreed.


Regards,
Juan M. Guerrero

- Raw text -