X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2008 15:39:05 +0100
From:	Manuel Collado <m DOT collado AT lml DOT ls DOT fi DOT upm DOT es>
User-Agent:	Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: ANNOUNCE: release 3 of the DJGPP port of GNU grep 2.5.3 uploaded.
References:	<200801202022 DOT m0KKMLg0001310 AT delorie DOT com> <47941ACF DOT B8EBD95B AT yahoo DOT com> <4c6759dd-f536-49ea-8d8b-a2feb5192d77 AT f47g2000hsd DOT googlegroups DOT com> <47956051 DOT 2DB8A290 AT yahoo DOT com> <29237ff0-179d-4d5a-a41c-45da1e35999a AT i12g2000prf DOT googlegroups DOT com> <200801222057 DOT m0MKv39r017880 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <47967CB4 DOT 493C0E1C AT yahoo DOT com> <27d1396a-7456-4a20-950b-22214ca9526c AT h11g2000prf DOT googlegroups DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<27d1396a-7456-4a20-950b-22214ca9526c@h11g2000prf.googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	138.100.242.202
Message-ID:	<4797529d$1@news.upm.es>
X-Trace:	news.upm.es 1201099421 138.100.242.202 (23 Jan 2008 15:43:41 +0100)
Lines:	35
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Juan Manuel Guerrero escribió:
> [snip]
> Neitherless, if DJ do not object I would suggest to change the
> actual naming convention and adopt one similar to the one
> that uses cygwin.  This is something like this:
>   foobar123-1[bsd].zip
> or
>   foobar20080123-1[bsd].zip
> The first means th package name followed by the version
> number followed by release number (1 in this case).   We also
> keep the b,d and s letters to code the type of package content.
> The second version is for CVS checkouts or something similar
> where the checkout timestamp is used as version number.
> Suggestions, objections, comments are welcome.

Just another possibility:

- Use the current naming convention for the first release of each port.
- Insert a 'rx' release designator before the [bsd] suffix for second 
and subsequent releases: xxx123b.zip -> xxx123r2b.zip -> xxx123r3b.zip

> I still insist that broken old releases must be retired.

Agreed.

> I do not want to have to answer user questions like "which one of the
> releases is the better one?" or "what shall I download?".

Using the same name for really different releases is even worse. A lot 
of users asking for help will insist in that their DJGPP environments 
are up-to-date when in fact the aren't

Regards.
-- 
Manuel Collado - http://lml.ls.fi.upm.es/~mcollado

- Raw text -