www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f |
From: | Glaux <glaux AT centrum DOT cz> |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: DPMI 0.9+ and 1.0 providers |
Date: | 6 May 2007 18:42:24 -0700 |
Organization: | http://groups.google.com |
Lines: | 7 |
Message-ID: | <1178502144.669916.139170@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> |
References: | <20070503225934 DOT GE21994 AT sfbrgenetics DOT org> |
<463a878c DOT sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu> | |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | 89.176.103.125 |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Trace: | posting.google.com 1178502145 3243 127.0.0.1 (7 May 2007 01:42:25 GMT) |
X-Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
NNTP-Posting-Date: | Mon, 7 May 2007 01:42:25 +0000 (UTC) |
In-Reply-To: | <463a878c.sandmann@clio.rice.edu> |
User-Agent: | G2/1.0 |
X-HTTP-UserAgent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.7.13) Gecko/20060414,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) |
Complaints-To: | groups-abuse AT google DOT com |
Injection-Info: | o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com; posting-host=89.176.103.125; |
posting-account=79KgoA0AAADKuOLK3k0Y3qVqk-KGfm77 | |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
Are there some performance differences between DPMIONE and CWSDPMI? And have DMPI 1.0 some advantages for DJGPP programs ? I Expect if the run under DPMI 0.9 it doesnt have any effect the presence of DPMI 1.0. I use CWSDPMI and also like CWSDSTUB to make my program compact if needed for some case. BTW are there some newer CWSDMI than 6-test?
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |