From:	Kev <krugman AT blueyonderspammaps DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Recent changes to C/C++ syntax
Message-ID:	<6bkk5v0h1bi59gu4lasee84fj4d1pomgba@4ax.com>
References:	<d900daeb DOT 0302240058 DOT 214e540a AT posting DOT google DOT com> <hnvj5vss7cbdn2f0trranjapqigri8qicq AT 4ax DOT com>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	30
Date:	Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:08:48 +0000
NNTP-Posting-Host:	62.31.215.114
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT blueyonder DOT co DOT uk
X-Trace:	news-binary.blueyonder.co.uk 1046106518 62.31.215.114 (Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:08:38 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:08:38 GMT
Organization:	blueyonder (post doesn't reflect views of blueyonder)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

OK, thanks for that Andrew,
I shall mosey on over to the GNU site soon

Kev.


On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:21:48 +1100, Andrew Cottrell
<andnews AT ihug DOT com DOT oz DOT au> wrote:

>>What I want to know is where is this documented ?
>This is a cope out, but it's in the latest C and C++ standards. The
>final releases are not available for download. Draft versions are
>available or you could try to find a book that has the latest C and
>C++ standards. You can purchase the standards from your national or
>state standards association.
>
>>I ask, because I want to know what other changes may be documented 
>>in the same place, because I could do with knowing in advance what 
>>has changed rather that have to spend an age trying to figure out
>>why my code won't compile anymore.
>In order to try to future proof yourself you may wany to have a look
>at the GNU C Compiler collection home page as the compiler is still
>being updated with each release to be more compliant. BTW Even MS .NET
>is not fully compliant, but it allot better than MSVC 6.
>
>GCC url:-
>http://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/gcc.html
>
>Andrew

- Raw text -