Mail Archives: djgpp/2003/02/18/06:24:22
On Tuesday 18 February 2003 09:53, Robert Hoehne wrote:
> CBFalconer schrieb:
> > I have here a RHIDE 1.5, 2002-08-29, which I downloaded from
> > somewhere a while ago. Is this noticeably (or even subtly)
> > different, i.e. should I replace it?
>
> What you have is an aplha release made by Andris. The release
> from me is not noticable different (mayba some minor bugs fixed).
> The main differences are, that I have built it using gcc 2.95.3
> and using gdb 5.3.
>
> I used gcc 2.95.3, because the built with gcc 3.2 was very unstable
> (probably, because the core DJGPP was not bult with gcc 3.2).
I have not used gcc-2.95.X to build RHIDE already for a rather long time
(I don't even have it installed)
I haven't built RHIDE for DJGPP already for a rather long time. Perhaps
build mentioned above was latest as far as I remember. For Linux I later
built RHIDE using GDB-5.3 (but it looks that I haven't put a related snapshot
at http://rhide.sourceforge.net/snapshots)
I don't think GCC-3.2.X is so bad. I had some stability problems, but they
were caused by some incompatibilities between GDB-5.3 and librhgdb in
RHIDE sources, but not due to problems of GCC-3.2.X. Of course, it could be
that I have skipped something.
I'm currently myself mostly using (under Linux) my last build of RHIDE (built
using GDB-5.3 and recent TVision and SetEdit CVS versions. But this version
is not near to release. It seems to work stable enough under X11 (perhaps
Andrew Cotterll can say more about DJGPP, as he tried to build RHIDE using
the TVision-2.0.X and recent SetEdit version for DJGPP.
Andris
- Raw text -