From:	jazzyjeff34 AT hotmail DOT com (Klytu)
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Updating DJGPP
Date:	14 Feb 2003 23:29:32 -0800
Organization:	http://groups.google.com/
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<250404d5.0302142329.4540c5e9@posting.google.com>
References:	<250404d5 DOT 0302131216 DOT 66f5d518 AT posting DOT google DOT com> <2ibp4v070k4r02dndgikcbat09pgd55r6m AT 4ax DOT com>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	66.2.44.39
X-Trace:	posting.google.com 1045294172 10712 127.0.0.1 (15 Feb 2003 07:29:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	groups-abuse AT google DOT com
NNTP-Posting-Date:	15 Feb 2003 07:29:32 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Andrew Cottrell <andnews AT ihug DOT com DOT oz DOT au> wrote in message news:<2ibp4v070k4r02dndgikcbat09pgd55r6m AT 4ax DOT com>...
> >I noticed that gcc version 3.2.2 was released last week. Will the
> >latest version of DJGPP work if gcc 3.2.2 is substituted for gcc
> >3.2.1?
> 
> So long as you have the GCC 3.2.2 binary files that have been built
> for DJGPP. They do exist, but they have not had allot of testing yet
> as you can see there has not been much time from the FSF release to
> now.
> 
> I have re-built GCC 3.2.2 on XP and have done a number of complete
> rebuild of most of the binary packages that people  use and so far
> they work.
> 
> Regards,
> Andrew

Thanks for the information.

- Raw text -