www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: djgpp/2003/01/15/08:16:40

From: eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg)
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject: Re: Partition/Cluster problem with sources...
Date: 15 Jan 2003 12:44:47 GMT
Organization: Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <b03l3v$a8e$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se>
References: <3 DOT 0 DOT 6 DOT 16 DOT 20030115130330 DOT 423fc348 AT pop3 DOT 01019freenet DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lws256.lu.erisoft.se
X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway: from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Michelle Konzack (dos DOT mailinglists AT freenet DOT de) wrote:
: because I run DJGPP under 100% dos only, I am limited to around 
: 65536 Clusters. I have following Partitions: 

: hda1    c       MD-DOS + DJGPP          128 MBytes      4 kB/Cluster 
: hda5    d       swappartition            64 MBytes      4 kB/Cluster 
: hda6    e       tmp                     128 MBytes      4 kB/Cluster 

: hda8    f       [free]                  128 Mbytes      4 kB/Cluster 
: hda9    g       [free]                  128 Mbytes      4 kB/Cluster 
: hda7    h       /usr/src  [my sources]  256 MBytes      8 kB/Cluster 

: nsf     i       mounted /home 

: But now I have problems with drive C: which is too small... 
: Not in Size but in Clusters... 

: How can I cut DJGPP to more then one Partition ? 

Until 2.04 is here with symbolic links, I don't know.

: Which directory(s) can I move to hda8 (f) and where must I change 
: the path ? 

: I need around 80.000 Clusters... 

Merge hda8 and hda9. Only h would change letter (and perhaps i, but as
that is a network drive it should be configurable).

Some notes:

1. There's something strange as hda7 should be before hda8 in the
DOZE lettering of drives.

2. How did you manage to get 4kB clusters on hda5. That should be 2kiB
cluster if you let DOZE format create it.

3. Make sure that you make the merged partition a little smaller than
256 so you get 4 kB clusters. You really should remake hda7 as well,
because of this. And perhaps hda[156] as well. You seem to have
choosen to make all your partition juuuuust a little too big to get
the better cluster size (smaller is better) (perhaps except for the
swap partition, where 4kiB should be optimal. Although I'm not sure it
matters much).


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019