Mail Archives: djgpp/2003/01/04/06:21:59
> From: "deckerben" <bdeck AT lycos DOT co DOT uk>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 21:02:02 +0100
>
> I asked the threads group about it and someone recommended pth. The version
> that seems to hold the best potential for a quick working port IMO is 1.1.6.
> But (at least this version) needs a second stack (probably for keeping track
> of mutex, i don't know...). DJGPP has no sigstack or sigaltstack.
>
> Is this something doable, or should I just stop now and not waste my time.
It's doable, but requires changes to the library. If you are
interested in working on this, please write to
djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com.
TIA
- Raw text -