www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
From: | eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se (Martin Stromberg) |
Newsgroups: | comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Subject: | Re: Flex/Byacc file naming question |
Date: | 28 May 2002 09:16:48 GMT |
Organization: | Ericsson Erisoft AB, Sweden |
Lines: | 20 |
Message-ID: | <acvhu0$gs$1@antares.lu.erisoft.se> |
References: | <3CF2C3DE DOT B8E4EB3A AT hfx DOT andara DOT com> <acvf4k$sjk$2 AT antares DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <acvgn9$9u2$1 AT nets3 DOT rz DOT RWTH-Aachen DOT DE> |
NNTP-Posting-Host: | lws256.lu.erisoft.se |
X-Newsreader: | TIN [version 1.2 PL2] |
To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
DJ-Gateway: | from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de) wrote: : Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> wrote: : > Because Byacc isn't by GNU? Compare with what bison does. : Just to throw in a nitpick: strictly spoken, flex isn't GNU either. : It comes under the GPL, and it's supported to some extent by the GNU : people (i.e. it's in their 'non-GNU free software' listing), but : that's about it. Ok. What I meant flex is GNU's lex and bison is GNU's yacc, in the sense that's the ones GNU uses and shows us on the www pages. Exactly what you, Hans-Bernhard, said (I think). Byacc is somebody else's. Right, MartinS
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |