X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
From:	"Michael Wahl, PicoQuant" <wahl AT pq DOT fta-berlin DOT NOSPAMPLEASE DOT de>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Protected Mode disk access
Date:	Fri, 25 Jan 2002 19:56:02 +0100
Organization:	PicoQuant
Lines:	32
Message-ID:	<3C51AA42.5A975E3A@pq.fta-berlin.NOSPAMPLEASE.de>
References:	<1011635483 DOT 28296 DOT 0 DOT nnrp-08 DOT c1ed6b28 AT news DOT demon DOT co DOT uk> <8011-Tue22Jan2002103628+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	quantum.pq.fta-berlin.de
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	rhodos.FTA-Berlin.de 1011984916 14863 141.16.70.115 (25 Jan 2002 18:55:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT rhodos DOT fta-berlin DOT de
NNTP-Posting-Date:	25 Jan 2002 18:55:16 GMT
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > From: "Tim Nicholson" <djgpp AT gizzy DOT co DOT uk>
> > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> > Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2002 17:45:50 -0000
> >
> > Am I correct in thinking the DJGPP switches from protected mode to real mode
> > to access the HDD and transfers data in 64K blocks (variable) via the DPMI
> > to and from DOS?
> 
> True, except that the default buffer size is 16KB, not 64KB.
> 
> > The reason for asking is that disk I/O seems much faster under Windows 98/ME
> > etc. and I am guessing this is partly because the whole thing is happening
> > in protected mode.
> 
> If you are comparing DOS and Windows, and see a significantly faster
> I/O on Windows, I suggest to install a large SmartDRV cache on the
> DOS machine, set it up to delayed-write operation, and try again.
> Chances are, you will see disk I/O that's as fast as on Windows.
> (Details can be found in section 3.9 of the DJGPP FAQ list.)
> 
> If you already have SmartDRV installed, please post the command line
> used to install it in AUTOEXEC.BAT.
> 
> > Does DOS (the one shipped with Win98) utilise the full capabilities of the
> > drive (i.e.. UDMA100 etc)?
> 
> Not DOS, BIOS.  DOS doesn't talk to the disk directly.


Ok, but can one get DMA under DOS/BIOS at all?

- Raw text -