X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mailnull set sender to djgpp-bounces using -f
Message-ID:	<3C38A367.D5FC4CA8@yahoo.com>
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: c++ with djgpp without long filenames
References:	<f5n61a DOT ihb DOT ln AT colin DOT ursa DOT de> <6ml91a DOT laj DOT ln AT colin DOT ursa DOT de> <3C3875A9 DOT 6DC12CC1 AT yahoo DOT com> <7263-Sun06Jan2002190540+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Lines:	44
Date:	Sun, 06 Jan 2002 20:02:18 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	12.90.172.96
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT worldnet DOT att DOT net
X-Trace:	bgtnsc06-news.ops.worldnet.att.net 1010347338 12.90.172.96 (Sun, 06 Jan 2002 20:02:18 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 06 Jan 2002 20:02:18 GMT
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
> > Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> > Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2002 16:33:49 GMT
> > >
> > > Executing "dir std_st~?.h" in c:\djgpp\lang\cxx-v3\bits shows four
> > > different files.
> >
> > This looks like a problem with the unzipper you used.  It seems to
> > have chosen the stored "short" names in the zipfile instead of the
> > long names.
> 
> There are no short file names in the zip file, only the long ones.
> So the unzipper cannot take the short names from anywhere, it has to
> invent them.
> 
> Normally, an unzip program just creates the file using its long name
> recorded in the archive, and DOS truncates to the 8+3 limits.  If some
> unzip program (pkunzip?) generates the numeric tails even on plain
> DOS, it's a pest and should not be used.
> 
> That's why installation instructions recommend to use unzip32.exe from
> SimTel: it does The Right Thing on all supported systems.
> 
> > Or it may be a problem with the zipper used in creating the zipfile
> > in the first place?
> 
> No, no problems with the zipper.  We use InfoZip's Zip program, which
> never failed us as far as file names are concerned.

Yes, but we don't know where *his* zipfiles have been.  For
example, some idiot may have unzipped then under W9x, then
repacked them with a DOS only zipper, or even under the DOS mode. 
Where else could his names with '~n's in them have come from? 
Look at the dir command he said he used (still quoted up top).

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT XXXXworldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   (Remove "XXXX" from reply address. yahoo works unmodified)
   mailto:uce AT ftc DOT gov  (for spambots to harvest)

- Raw text -