X-Authentication-Warning:	kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date:	Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:02:44 -0500
From:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: MAKEing Turbo Vision 1.1.3
Message-ID:	<20011018120244.B21027@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
References:	<im4mstk71bb1ondv81goeqsededhsiqj0b AT 4ax DOT com> <3BCB274A DOT 34F2631 AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <j0fnst84g4o75b64184kvs3dhlvg3j5gki AT 4ax DOT com> <3BCC49EC DOT 5FB4D8ED AT inti DOT gov DOT ar> <3995-Tue16Oct2001175743+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <20011016130041 DOT A19158 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <20011017184410 DOT A919 AT mediacom DOT it>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<20011017184410.A919@mediacom.it>; from am@mediacom.it on Wed, Oct 17, 2001 at 06:44:10PM +0200
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

-: > go32-v2 (without ramdisk or smartdrv)
-: > -------------------------------------
-: > DPMI memory available: 5333Kb
-: > DPMI swap space available: 7583Kb
-:
-: A really low memory condition. And with smartdrv loaded is even worse.
-: Probably this invalidate the test.

What test?  I was interested to determine the effects of a ramdisk
and a smartdrv cache on the configuration and compile times with *my*
pathetic little machine.  Any other interpretation of the numbers must
first consider if the test conditions I described are relevant to the
performance questions you have.  In this case, I learned that when using
gcc 3.0 I obtain the best performance if I let gcc have all the RAM I
possibly can.  OTOH, gcc 2.7.2.1 benefits from an appropriately-sized
ram disk or disk cache.  That's useful for me to know.

- Raw text -