From:	Jason Green <news AT jgreen4 DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Weekly Mini-FAQ post for DJGPP
Date:	Sun, 16 Sep 2001 20:39:25 +0100
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<12v9qt4seutpl5k45udgethh57gjibm2nj@4ax.com>
References:	<200109100500 DOT BAA12378 AT delorie DOT com> <3BA371F0 DOT 2D0BEE68 AT yahoo DOT com> <1438-Sat15Sep2001190651+0300-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <fod9qtkbk0389173acsd0u8aobklgv95f9 AT 4ax DOT com> <3BA4C7ED DOT 72A516F7 AT uol DOT com DOT br>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	modem-216.carbon.dialup.pol.co.uk
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	news8.svr.pol.co.uk 1000669214 3084 62.136.5.216 (16 Sep 2001 19:40:14 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	16 Sep 2001 19:40:14 GMT
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT theplanet DOT net
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Cesar Rabak <csrabak AT uol DOT com DOT br> wrote:

> > > Not that I object to adding the zip file names, but if we are going to
> > > do that, we should probably change the format as well:
> > >
> > >    binutils-2.11.2           bnu2112b.zip, bnu2112s.zip
> > >    bison-1.29              bsn129b.zip,  bsn129s.zip
> > 
> > Timestamp and filesize should probably be listed too, to catch the cases
> > when a package is re-released under the same name.
> > 
> > How about also prefixing each line with an asterix if the package is less
> > than a month old?
> 
> Whereas I second these nice ideas, I believe it is time to consider they
> should be implemented by use of some sort of script to automate this
> otherwise, we're putting too much burden in DJ!

Absolutely!  But first it must be decided *if* the format should change,
and then what it should change to.

Even without listing the filenames or other details, it would be useful
to see at a glance any new or re-released packages, IMHO.

- Raw text -