Message-ID:	<3B113509.B646BD21@earthlink.net>
From:	Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl AT earthlink DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en,zh-CN,fr,de-CH,ru
MIME-Version:	1.0
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: signed or unsigned
References:	<1104_990965387 AT default>
Lines:	23
Date:	Sun, 27 May 2001 17:07:57 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	209.246.83.138
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT earthlink DOT net
X-Trace:	newsread2.prod.itd.earthlink.net 990983277 209.246.83.138 (Sun, 27 May 2001 10:07:57 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Sun, 27 May 2001 10:07:57 PDT
Organization:	EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net
X-Received-Date:	Sun, 27 May 2001 10:06:03 PDT (newsmaster1.prod.itd.earthlink.net)
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Florian Xaver wrote:
> 
> Hi!
> 
> I have a stupid question:
> 
> If I only write
> 
> int i;
> 
> Is int signed or unsigned, i think signed?

That's right.

> Where can I change it (gcc - parameters)?

In the declaration:
  unsigned int i;
or
  unsigned i;

You should not be trying to gratuitously make gcc behave in a
noncomforming way.

- Raw text -