www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Originating-IP: | [24.232.1.206] |
From: | "Norberto Alfredo Bensa" <ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com> |
To: | <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> |
References: | <9cg46n$kk5$1 AT sunlight DOT pku DOT edu DOT cn> |
Subject: | Re: gcc for djgpp vs borland c compiler |
Date: | Sun, 29 Apr 2001 04:11:10 -0300 |
Organization: | nBens@ Computers |
X-Priority: | 3 |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 |
Message-ID: | <OE80iPNMwplEHXU1dtm0000124c@hotmail.com> |
X-OriginalArrivalTime: | 29 Apr 2001 07:14:19.0105 (UTC) FILETIME=[01CC1D10:01C0D07C] |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
http://www.delorie.com/djgpp/v2faq/faq8_14.html Regards, Norberto ----- Original Message ----- From: "Danny" <dguo AT 263 DOT net> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com> Sent: Sunday, April 29, 2001 01:01 Subject: gcc for djgpp vs borland c compiler > Hi, THere. > > I have got both gcc for djgpp and borland C compiler (bcc32). I compared > them on a simple 'hello world' C code. I found gcc made a EXE with size of > 107,516bytes, while bcc32 generated a EXE with size of 52,736bytes. > > How come they are so different? > > Thanks. > > > Dan > >
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |