X-Originating-IP:	[200.42.6.189]
From:	"Norberto Alfredo Bensa" <ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com>
To:	<djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<987710007 DOT 24446 DOT 0 DOT pluto DOT d4ee1e86 AT news DOT demon DOT nl> <987712178 DOT 25575 DOT 0 DOT pluto DOT d4ee1e86 AT news DOT demon DOT nl>
Subject:	Re: trouble with classes (for me a unexplainable crash)
Date:	Thu, 19 Apr 2001 18:25:41 -0300
Organization:	nBens@ Computers
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID:	<OE62xc1o8yfogkJXrRj00002159@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	19 Apr 2001 21:26:32.0380 (UTC) FILETIME=[67792FC0:01C0C917]
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Perhaps object3d is too big to fit in the stack... 68(bytes)*10000 =
~664KBytes

Best regards,
Norberto




----- Original Message -----
From: "Santing, Peter" <peter DOT nospam DOT santing AT phibian DOT net>
Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
To: <djgpp AT delorie DOT com>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 5:38 PM
Subject: Re: trouble with classes (for me a unexplainable crash)


> It seems that I fixed it.. although I do not understand why this method
> works and my old one not:-
>
> I have changed the following line into 2 lines:-
>
> object3d    mypoly;
>
> into...
>
> object3d    *mypoly;
> mypoly = new object3d;
>
> and every mypoly.xxxxxxxx ref to mypoly->xxxxxxx.
>
> it does the same and it seems to be working..
>
> if anyone knows why this works and the old method not.. please post your
> answer.. I want to know why..
>
> Regards,
>     Peter Santing
>

- Raw text -