From:	Nate Eldredge <neldredge AT hmc DOT edu>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: Atof
Date:	18 Apr 2001 12:47:33 -0700
Organization:	InterWorld Communications
Lines:	28
Sender:	nate AT mercury DOT st DOT hmc DOT edu
Message-ID:	<83y9syat2i.fsf@mercury.st.hmc.edu>
References:	<3ADDDAE3 DOT 29499 DOT 112013C AT localhost> <OE282LTrpwACkWHZqYW00001f8d AT hotmail DOT com> <slrn9drnf6 DOT jqc DOT rpolzer AT www42 DOT t-offline DOT de>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	mercury.st.hmc.edu
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Trace:	nntp1.interworld.net 987623253 42580 134.173.57.219 (18 Apr 2001 19:47:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT news DOT interworld DOT net
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:47:33 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.5
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

rpolzer AT www42 DOT t-offline DOT de (echo 'Rudolf Polzer'>/dev/null) writes:

> Norberto Alfredo Bensa <ceo AT nbensacomputers DOT com> wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > Hi,
> > > i have this problem with atof();
> > >
> > > char *buf = "-21.345\0";
> > 
> > while not a bug, you can write "-21.345"...
> 
> BTW: Does it waste one byte?

No.

> That is, does "\000TEST" allocate one or six bytes?

Five, actually.  It seems that if the string contains a nul
explicitly, the compiler will store it as written, but not
automatically add another nul at the end at the end.  This is useful
for writing char sequences that aren't really strings in the concise
string format.

-- 

Nate Eldredge
neldredge AT hmc DOT edu

- Raw text -