Mail Archives: djgpp/2001/03/16/18:31:58
On Sat, 10 Mar 2001 19:53:49 +0200, "Eli Zaretskii"
<eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> wrote:
>> From: damon AT WRONG DOT redshift DOT com (Damon Casale)
>> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
>> Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2001 17:59:12 GMT
>> >>
>> >> Hmm. Apparently, I already have DJGPP v2.03.
>> >
>> >Are you sure? The above output surely look amazingly similar to the
>> >problem with v2.02 library described in the FAQ. How did you check
>> >that you have v2.03?
>>
>> I checked my install directory. I have the BinUtils 2.9.5.1 (or
>> however you arrange the dots) zip file there. I checked the date/time
>> stamp of gprof in the zip file and compared it with the gprof on my
>> test machine. Same date/time stamp, same file size.
>
>Gprof is not the problem: the bug described in the FAQ was in the
>DJGPP library, and it affected the profiled code, not Gprof itself.
>That is, the profiled code would report bogus profile data.
Errr...wouldn't it cause a problem if gprof was compiled with the
earlier library?
Oh, and I never had v2.02, apparently. I started using DJGPP after
v2.03 came out.
Damon Casale, damon AT WRONG DOT redshift DOT com (remove the obvious)
A little ad lib(c) wouldn't hurt, would it?
- Raw text -