From:	"Dylan Trotter" <heavier AT hotmail DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<u98p6.31132$c7 DOT 9620206 AT news3 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com> <98359g$364j$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de>
Subject:	Re: Calling convention
Lines:	38
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Message-ID:	<xQ8p6.31217$c7.9660382@news3.rdc1.on.home.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 Mar 2001 17:08:45 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	24.43.108.121
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT home DOT net
X-Trace:	news3.rdc1.on.home.com 983898525 24.43.108.121 (Tue, 06 Mar 2001 09:08:45 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Tue, 06 Mar 2001 09:08:45 PST
Organization:	Excite AT Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Okay thanks,

So basically I can clobber any or all of eax, ecx and edx.

"Alexei A. Frounze" <dummy_addressee AT hotmail DOT com> wrote in message
news:98359g$364j$1 AT ID-57378 DOT news DOT dfncis DOT de...
> extra note.
> in your ASM functions you don't have to remove parameters from stack by
> using RET N instruction because the caller removes that stuff from the
stack
>
> --
> Alexei A. Frounze
> alexfru [AT] chat [DOT] ru
> http://alexfru.chat.ru
> http://members.xoom.com/alexfru/
> http://welcome.to/pmode/
>
>
> "Dylan Trotter" <heavier AT hotmail DOT com> wrote in message
> news:u98p6.31132$c7 DOT 9620206 AT news3 DOT rdc1 DOT on DOT home DOT com...
> > I am writing some NASM functions to be linked with ld, but I'm not sure
> what
> > the calling convention is with regard to changed registers. Do I have to
> > save all registers inside a function or a subset of them, or does the
> caller
> > have to worry about that?
> >
> > Thank you,
> >     Dylan Trotter
> >     heavier AT hotmail DOT com
> >
> >
> >
>
>

- Raw text -