www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 5 Mar 2001 09:16:02 +0200 (IST) |
From: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
X-Sender: | eliz AT is |
To: | Daniel Barker <sokal AT holyrood DOT ed DOT ac DOT uk> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Penalty for immature language (PERL/BASH) |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.SOL.4.21.0103042124120.24390-100000@holyrood.ed.ac.uk> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1010305091433.23825D-100000@is> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 4 Mar 2001, Daniel Barker wrote: > But if poo (without extension) were run from > PERL as `poo`, would the underlying call to system() still find poo.exe, > poo.com and whatever other programs one would expect to work without an > extension? Yes, .exe, .com, .bat, and .btm files are still found.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |