Date:	Sun, 21 Jan 2001 08:17:22 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: seeking help on make
In-Reply-To:	<c6jk6t8iguloaleeeffsa78hfp6gbp75ll@4ax.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1010121081305.13920F-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 21 Jan 2001, al wrote:

> >Which version of binutils?
> 
> The binutils I use comes from bnu2951b.zip. The doc says it's beta. Then what
> version is "safe"?

Yes, it's safe, but I suggest to upgrade to the latest bnu210b.zip, which 
is better and safer.  Don't use beta software unless you are prepared to
deal with unexpected problems.

> Who knows what version combinations between Allegro/Binutils/Something_else are
> proved to be ok?

All of them.  See my other message in this thread (posted yesterday).

> The errors are not just warning. They prevent me from finishing the building so
> that I cannot test compiling any examples as simple as 'Hello World' with
> Allegro library.

I didn't see any fatal messages that were related to Binutils.  If you 
mean the "unresolved references" to enable_irq and restore_irq, that's 
another issue.  I don't think it's related to Binutils, but just in case, 
upgrade to Binutils 2.10 and try again.

- Raw text -