From:	"mike friedrichs" <mike_fr1 AT txucom DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	dos extenders
Date:	Thu, 21 Dec 2000 17:03:59 -0600
Organization:	LCC Internet
Lines:	26
Message-ID:	<91u2f8$h04@atlas.lcc.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	conr-ddas5-a30.txucom.net
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Readers,

this query to sort out facts, not to start flames.

the final product will be ported an eeprom or flash for embedded
applications with a TCP/IP stack, using serial interface versus ethernet.

I'm investigating the pro's and con's of '3' 32 bit dos extenders;
tenberry(dos/4g), pharlap(TNT-realtime), and djgpp. I've built the same,
fairly, simple program on all '3' and all work well.

the obvious difference I see with djgpp is the complete development system
is packaged as '1' part; libraries, IDE, compiler, debugger, etc. where the
other '2'  vendors are using parts from other vendors. for me it's watcom or
Microsoft.

and djgpp is free, but paying a fair market price for good software is not a
problem for me.

besides what I have mentioned, what are the other advantages with djgpp ?

thanks,
mike friedrichs

- Raw text -