From:	AndrewJ <luminous-is AT REMOVE DOT home DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: memset etc.
Message-ID:	<debmps8j582s2pgdirs5nl38195l04gqlk@4ax.com>
References:	<8mu28b$202$1 AT nslave1 DOT tin DOT it>
X-Newsreader:	Forte Agent 1.7/32.534
MIME-Version:	1.0
Lines:	16
Date:	Thu, 17 Aug 2000 00:14:21 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host:	24.42.120.18
X-Complaints-To:	abuse AT home DOT net
X-Trace:	news2.rdc1.on.home.com 966471261 24.42.120.18 (Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:14:21 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	Wed, 16 Aug 2000 17:14:21 PDT
Organization:	Excite AT Home - The Leader in Broadband
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

>Sorry I'm newbie. I've a little problem with a code I've ported from Watcom:
>"General Protection Fault at eip=00002e95 etc. etc."

[snip]

As a follow up to the provided solutions, I just want to mention that pretty
much anything that is hardware dependent will have to be "ported" to DJGPP.
You can't just plug in the code.  DJGPP is far better than Watcom about
protecting memory and such (convinced of this by Eli Z. :)  But this goes for
any compiler (Borland, Microsoft, Symantec, etc...).

-------
AndrewJ

"This is a wonderful answer.  It's off-topic, it's incorrect, and it doesn't
answer the question." - Richard Heathfield.

- Raw text -