Message-Id:	<200008111728.NAA06831@delorie.com>
Date:	Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:31:31 +0200
To:	news AT jgreen4 DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk
X-Mailer:	Emacs 20.6 (via feedmail 8.2.emacs20_6 I) and Blat ver 1.8.5b
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<tae6pscelfpqbs7lvoe7vsc5qcuriq9dun@4ax.com> (message from Jason
	Green on Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:25:17 +0100)
Subject:	Re: DJGPP neither running on ms-dos 6.2 nor on caldera-dos 7.03
References:	<8mq6n6$6gu8v$1 AT ID-16903 DOT news DOT cis DOT dfn DOT de> <39912C43 DOT DF0BB5FD AT maths DOT unine DOT ch> <200008091553 DOT LAA13441 AT delorie DOT com> <tae6pscelfpqbs7lvoe7vsc5qcuriq9dun AT 4ax DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: Jason Green <news AT jgreen4 DOT fsnet DOT co DOT uk>
> Newsgroups: comp.os.msdos.djgpp
> Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:25:17 +0100
> 
> Most of these FAQs probably stem from #include <iostream>, which has
> streambuf.h nested in it.

This is only one of the problems.  Take a look at lang/cxx and
lang/cxx/std: there are a lot of files there whose names exceed the
DOS 8+3 limits.

> How about making a copy of streambuf.h with
> an 8.3 filename and editing the nested include within iostream.h?

You suggest a manual solution.  This is error prone (what if someone
who ports GCC forgets to do that?), and it doesn't solve the case when
a new header is introduced with a new release of GCC that wasn't known
before.

> This could reduce the FAQs even though it does not actually fix the
> problem.  And if you catch the GNU maintainers in the right mood, who
> knows... ;-)

We have been unable to catch the GCC maintainers ``in the right mood''
to solve even simpler and more annoying problems.

Anyway, thanks for the suggestions.

- Raw text -