Date:	Sun, 6 Aug 2000 07:27:29 +0600 (LKT)
From:	Kalum Somaratna aka Grendel <kalum AT lintux DOT cx>
X-Sender:	kalum AT roadrunner DOT grendel DOT net
To:	Stan Moore <smoore AT exis DOT net>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: BREAKing out of a nested loop
In-Reply-To:	<lccoosgnj507r1icimd8f193fgops7e7cn@4ax.com>
Message-ID:	<Pine.LNX.4.21.0008060723090.14282-100000@roadrunner.grendel.net>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 5 Aug 2000, Stan Moore spoke the following immortal words,

> 
> experience (at this point I'm not counting anymore but it's over 25
> years) teaches most, and I am in the group of believers, that goto's
> are crutches that help get out of a problem you didn't understand well
> enough to avoid getting in a situation that requires them in the first
> place.

Excellent! The above statement says it all actually about using GOTO's.

Actually a goto statement wouldn't be that bad in a single small file you
are writing for fun, but goto statements in a multiple file large product
would create maintainenance nightmares for all who use it subsequently.

Best Wishes,
Grendel

Hi, I'm a signature virus. plz set me as your signature and help me spread
:)

- Raw text -