From:	"Sébastien Kirche" <seki AT club-internet DOT fr>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Re: how to reduce virtual memory ?
Date:	Wed, 19 Jul 2000 19:08:08 +0200
Organization:	Club-Internet (France)
Lines:	18
Message-ID:	<8l4nat$j3u$1@front1m.grolier.fr>
References:	<8l1ffl$j08$1 AT front7 DOT grolier DOT fr> <3975AA07 DOT 41C67EA6 AT uic DOT rnd DOT runnet DOT ru>
NNTP-Posting-Host:	metz-1-90.club-internet.fr
X-Trace:	front1m.grolier.fr 964026525 19582 195.36.189.90 (19 Jul 2000 17:08:45 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Date:	19 Jul 2000 17:08:45 GMT
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Thanks for advices.
Sorry but that piece of code is quite too big and too imbricated to pick an
extract from to show here. It must mean that is it ok for rewriting :)

Maybe i gonna try to wipe out all the old 16 bits memory cooking. For a true
port.
But it was just a test to see if grx with new bcc2grx library is useful to
re-use old code...

But i still don't undersand why the debuggers crash, even when i try to stop
at the beginning of code, before any 16 access (ie: try a breakpoint at
beginning of main) ?
Tried "nm" but not sure how it could be useful for me.

BTW: does anyone tried to use softice for a debugging of djgpp under win32
platform ?

- Raw text -