Message-ID:	<3923B96E.77F5890A@mtu-net.ru>
Date:	Thu, 18 May 2000 13:35:42 +0400
From:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.72 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language:	ru,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: C++, complex, etc
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1000518113013 DOT 12245H-100000 AT is>
X-Recipient:	eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 17 May 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:
> 
> > I simply flame because C++ library implementations are different in
> > different compilers.
> 
> Welcome to C++.  If you don't like languages that are not standardized
> enough, don't use C++, at least not just yet.

Yup. Very friendly programming language. :))

> > > > Btw, what so I need size_t for, if both size_t and
> > > > int equal the same machine word?
> > >
> > > *If*. But how on earth is a program supposed to know if that condition
> > > holds, on the compiler it's being put through?
> >
> > I don't understand your phrase. Please tell it in other words, if possible.
> 
> You said "if both size_t and int equal the same machine word".
> Hans-Bernhard is telling you that that's a big ``if'', and a portable
> program cannot rely on that fact, or even verify it reliably.

I didn't say size_t is for user. :)

bye.
Alexei A. Frounze
-----------------------------------------
Homepage: http://alexfru.chat.ru
Mirror:   http://members.xoom.com/alexfru

- Raw text -