Date:	Thu, 18 May 2000 14:14:06 +0300 (IDT)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: C++, complex, etc
In-Reply-To:	<3923B90D.22A6AEBC@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000518141100.13603B-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 18 May 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> So do we already have that standard, right?

Yes.

> Where can I find specs

ANSI and ISO sell it for some money.

> and a compiler that supports it?

AFAIK, no compiler/library are currently 100% complying.  MSVC and GCC 
come close, though.  Rumor has it that the next release 3.0 of libstdc++ 
will implement the entire Standard C++ library.

> > I understand that it tells what the other people said in this thread:
> > that you need to use "complex<double>" etc.
> 
> You understand. That's good. But does that mean you saw the specs?

No, I understand that from other people who posted here.  I myself don't 
care much about C++.

- Raw text -