Date:	Thu, 13 Apr 2000 11:29:46 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	"Alexei A. Frounze" <alex DOT fru AT mtu-net DOT ru>
cc:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: inefficiency of GCC output code & -O problem
In-Reply-To:	<38F4C0D9.C73A8E0A@mtu-net.ru>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1000413112851.28180G-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 12 Apr 2000, Alexei A. Frounze wrote:

> Better try it under 2.95.2. You'll encounter the same thingy.
> AND THE CODE IS DEFINETELY NOT BUGGY!!! the program compiles and works as it
> should. Don't you think if program works normally, source is okay too? Or you
> think EXE is no made out of the source at all???
[snip]
> What do you think of it, huh?

Sorry, this is too hostile to let it go unnoticed.

Please remember that people who reply to your questions do that on
their free time, willing to help you.  Shouting at them and insulting
them in return is not nice, to say the least.

On top of that, Hans-Bernhard is a veteran DJGPP user, has helped many
people on this forum through many years, and is generally known to
know what he is talking about.  He might be mistaken, as we all are
from time to time, but he never means anything except giving you free
help.

If you don't like the answers, simply ignore them.  But flaming people
for willing to help you is bad net etiquette, and is generally
considered inappropriate in this news group.

- Raw text -