www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Mon, 3 Apr 2000 10:20:09 +0200 (WET) |
From: | Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv> |
To: | Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
cc: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: Gdb and floating point |
In-Reply-To: | <Pine.SUN.3.91.1000402091127.9367A-100000@is> |
Message-ID: | <Pine.A41.4.05.10004031011540.47140-100000@ieva05.lanet.lv> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
Reply-To: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sun, 2 Apr 2000, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Mar 2000 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote: > > > At least I built gdb-20000327 for DJGPP without problems (thanks Eli > > for that) > > Thanks for testing it. Earlier I also tested cross-building GDB snapshot for DJGPP under Linux. All also worked except I had to patch one source that went into CVS later. So I think we should not have problems both with building current GDB snapshots for DJGPP both with DJGPP and also under Linux > > > Also. Had to hack RHIDE rather much to be able to build it using this > > snapshot. > > Could you summarize the problems you had with building RHIDE? Is > there something in GDB 5.0 that should be changed to make it easier? > I don't think so. RHIDE should be modified in this case. Even if I suceeded to get working binary of RHIDE with recent snapshot additional changes in RHIDE are still needed. I think that changes in GDB is a steps in right direction. Andris
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |