From:	"Curioso" <bib AT southafro DOT com>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
References:	<38B0C5F0 DOT B1C9B111 AT home DOT com> <9fm1bs8il34e9rq08q1hkcm9trhijg3rg6 AT 4ax DOT com> <38B13987 DOT 6D90047D AT a DOT crl DOT com> <88rfjr$plj$1 AT zingo DOT tninet DOT se>
Subject:	Re: Borland C++ compiler free!
Date:	Sun, 27 Feb 2000 19:09:28 -0800
Lines:	18
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6600
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
NNTP-Posting-Host:	209.239.212.85
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host:	209.239.212.85
Message-ID:	<38bb387f_3@news.jps.net>
X-Trace:	28 Feb 2000 19:09:51 -0800, 209.239.212.85
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host:	209.63.224.240
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

How do we know if commercial software use some of the code from the open
source community if they do not release their source?????


"Marcus" <mesthlm AT hem DOT passagen DOT se> wrote in message
news:88rfjr$plj$1 AT zingo DOT tninet DOT se...
> > It's not open source.  However Borland's intention is to support open
> > source with it.  It's like 'we support free speech with free beer'.
> Maybe a stupid question but... What's the source code that it supports
now?
>
> --
> /regards Marcus
>
>
>

- Raw text -