From:	"Rossz Vámos-Wentworth" <rossw AT jps DOT net>
Newsgroups:	comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Subject:	Building cross - yet again
Date:	Mon, 21 Feb 2000 19:49:39 -0800
Lines:	47
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Newsreader:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200
NNTP-Posting-Host:	209.239.198.14
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host:	209.239.198.14
Message-ID:	<38b207d1_2@news.jps.net>
X-Trace:	21 Feb 2000 19:51:45 -0800, 209.239.198.14
X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host:	209.63.224.240
To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com
DJ-Gateway:	from newsgroup comp.os.msdos.djgpp
Reply-To:	djgpp AT delorie DOT com

I've been able to mostly work past the "size_t" conflict problem.  I found
it defined as "unsigned long " in one place, and "long unsigned int" in
another.  I changed the second to match the first and it now gets further
along in the build.  I narrowed it down to a single file that won't build.
When "make" launches this (all one line):






./xgcc-B/djgpp/cross/h8300-hms/bin/ -B./ -I/djgpp/cross/h8300-hms/include -O
2 -c ./cp/tinfo.cc

I get these errors:

     In file included from ./cp/tinfo.cc:32:
     include/new:28: `operator new' takes type `size_t' as first parameter
     include/new:29: `operator new' takes type `size_t' as first parameter
     include/new:32: `operator new' takes type `size_t' as first parameter
     include/new:33: `operator new' takes type `size_t' as first parameter
     include/new:38: `operator new' takes type `size_t' as first parameter
     include/new:39: `operator new' takes type `size_t' as first parameter

I examined "new", and it looks just fine.  All the declarations look normal.
Here are the lines that are producing errors.

     void *operator new (size_t) throw (std::bad_alloc);
     void *operator new[] (size_t) throw (std::bad_alloc);
     void *operator new (size_t, const std::nothrow_t&) throw();
     void *operator new[] (size_t, const std::nothrow_t&) throw();
     inline void *operator new(size_t, void *place) throw() { return
place; }
     inline void *operator new[](size_t, void *place) throw() { return
place; }

I don't think it has anything to do with the definition of size_t, but I am
at a loss as to what is the actual problem.  As an experiment, I added
"typedef unsigned long size_t;" to the file "new", but it did not make a
difference.

Again, thanks.

Rossz

- Raw text -