Mail Archives: djgpp/2000/02/16/08:40:24
> >It's fast and reliable,
>
> Are you sure you are refeerring to windows and not to linux/
> UNIX ;-)
> Fast??? I certainly don't think so. Even on my athlon 500 mhz it takes
> it's time starting up and it is very slooow. It is bloated too taking a
> huge amount of memory...
On my Pentium-233 it does take a long time to start up, but once running, it
can multitask much more smoothly than Win9x - I can play an mp3 and work at
the same time under Win2000, whereas under Win95 the music would start
skipping if I did anything else.
> Could you please tell me since the day that you installed win2000 how
> many crashes did you get?
Well, various applications have crashed, but Windows2000 itsself has never
crashed. When an app crashes I can always kill it in Task Manager, and
continue with my Windows session.
> I installed RH linux6.0 and I still haven't got a crash for over 4 months.
I can't comment about linux - I've never used it and I really don't want to
learn another set of commands. If anyone writes a DOS emulator for Linux, I
might give it a go :-)
> Actually Chris this is quite wrong, AFAIK due to windoze's intrinsically
> faulty design one badly behaved app can indeed bring the whole system
> crashing to the ground.
This has never happened to me. The only time I've seen Win2k totally crash
is if a full-screen DOS-app causes a fault in ntvdm - in which case, the
whole system does die.
> there was this user who was complainig that RHIDE with windoze
> gave him a back screen and then the system locked up.
This is the example I was talking about above; however, if you run RHIDE
windowed then all that happens is it kills the process when it crashes.
> I think Chris you should not belive all the hype that microshaft is
> delivering.
I'm not believing any hype - I've used Win2000 myself for 2 months now, and
am speaking from experience.
> > IMO, Win2000 is good value for money.
>
> I don't belive i'm reading this ;-)
Look, it's only a figure of speech - I mean, it's a good OS. I wouldn't pay
the $88 or whatever it costs.
> FWIW I allways install windoze from a pirated CD
Exactly - did you think I was an official beta tester?
> IMHO Windoze is just good to run the occasional game you have, It is
> _not_ good for any serious work.
I admit that it's not good for servers or time-critical applications. But
for the average home user, who just wants to do some word processing and
play a few games, Windows is the best out there.
- Raw text -